Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résidant dans l’Ouest canadien depuis plusieurs années, j’ai vu s’y développer une pratique et une esthétique théâtrales audacieuses, qui mettent à profit le bilinguisme des francophones en situation minoritaire. No more the source of an identity predicament, the bilingualism of Western French-Canadians has become a creative material to explore in order to not only reflect their daily reality on their stages but also to generate new practices and a new theatrical aesthetics. Chez Marc Prescott, par exemple, les nombreuses alternances de codes dans Sex, Lies et les Franco-Manitobains servent à élaborer des jeux de mots, des équivoques et des quiproquos que seuls les spectateurs bilingues peuvent saisir, ce qui met en relief les avantages que procure leur bilinguisme. With Prescott, the code switching is not always reproducing reality, it is sometimes an innovative aesthetic device as in the « Bob Burns/Robert Brulé » monologue (in Mes shorts) in which the francophone and anglophone voices of the sole narrator compete to tell the same story but from a different point of view. Mettant leur bilinguisme à profit, les artistes franco-canadiens de l’Ouest présentent leurs spectacles avec surtitres anglais depuis 2007. English surtitles allow French-Canadian theatres west of Quebec to reach the large English-speaking audience that surrounds them while keeping intact the language and the visual aesthetics of their French or bilingual productions. In Western Canada, only Francophone theatres use surtitles, which is an indication of the asymmetrical power relations between Canada’s official languages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.050 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".