MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511692255 · doi:10.1346/cms-wls-21-5

High-Speed, Coupled Micro-Beam XRD/XRF/XAFS Mapping at GSECARS

2016· book-chapter· en· W2511692255 on OpenAlexaffabout
Antonio Lanzirotti, M. Newville, Lori Manoukian, K. Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueClay Minerals Society eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Safety CommissionQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray absorption fine structureMaterials scienceBeam (structure)OpticsPhysicsSpectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present study describes new instrumentation developments at the GSECARS 13-ID-E hard X-ray microprobe beamline at the Advanced Photon Source that allows for high-speed, coupled micro-beam X-ray diffractions/X-ray fluorescence/X-ray absorption fine structure mapping. These new methodologies provide Earth and environmental scientists with unique coupled tools for evaluating microscale mineralogical and chemical heterogeneities in fine-grained sediments, soils, shales, and mine tailings and associated secondary precipitates. In particular, new technologies and approaches for integrating fast µXRD mapping into routine X-ray microprobe beamline operations are described and several real-world examples are given of how this approach provides unique insights with regards to micrometer-scale heterogeneities in mineralogy and chemistry that are difficult to obtain by other methods. Examples described here include waste streams associated with mine tailings from the McClean Lake mining facility located on the eastern edge of the Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan, Canada, and from mine-drainage waters from the epithermal Au-Ag-Cu deposits of the Lagunas Norte mine in the Peruvian Andes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClay Minerals Society eBooksSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207