Optimal conditions for the performance of a monocyte monolayer assay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various versions of the monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) have been used to assess clinical significance of red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies in transfusion for more than 35 years. However, the optimal conditions, including anticoagulant used for whole blood samples, temperature and duration of storage, and optimal pH for assessing the response of monocytes to antibody-bound RBCs, have never been clearly delineated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RBCs was used as the positive control for comparison studies. Whole blood was taken into ACD and kept at RT until testing, from patients with or without immune hemolytic anemia. RESULTS: control RBCs were observed using ACD anticoagulant between freshly drawn or up to 36-hour-stored whole blood kept at RT, regardless of the donor. Physiologic pH during MMA was important for optimal monocyte interactions with antibody-opsonized RBCs. MMA results with patient samples, under optimal conditions, kept up to 30 hours in one instance of long-distance shipment, correlated with clinical hemolysis. CONCLUSION: MMA can be reliably performed on whole blood samples drawn into ACD and kept at RT for up to 36 hours and when physiologic pH is maintained during the assay. Future studies are required to confirm whether use of these conditions with patient monocytes can provide accurate determination of alloantibody significance in patients requiring blood transfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".