MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2512525358 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2599819

A Novel Online Charging Algorithm for Electric Vehicles Under Stochastic Net-Load

2016· article· en· W2512525358 on OpenAlexaff
Abdoulmenim Bilh, Kshirasagar Naik, Ramadan El‐Shatshat

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermittencyComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)AlgorithmRenewable energyLoad balancing (electrical power)ExploitReal-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringGridMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel charging algorithm for electric vehicles (EVs) in smart grids. Unlike traditional charging methods, this algorithm is designed to exploit the flexibility of the EVs' load to absorb the unforeseen fluctuations in the net-load caused mainly by the intermittency of the renewable energy sources (RES) (wind energy). In this paper, we first formulate the problem with traditional charging algorithms in the presence of RESs. Second, we show that the overall energy consumed by the overall load in the system can be estimated ahead of time despite the stochastic behavior of the net-load. Third, a detailed description of our online algorithm shows how EVs' charging decision is taken by the utility server in real time - not ahead of time - according to the current situation of the net-load. Also, unlike most of the charging algorithms in literature, our proposed algorithm considers keeping the charging current constant, thus, imposing less technical and engineering requirements and complexity on the EVs' charging infrastructure. Finally, to test the performance of our online charging algorithm, a tool has been developed in Java to simulate our algorithm. A comprehensive performance evaluation of our algorithm against a traditional ahead-of-time charging algorithm shows clear improvements achieved by our algorithm in absorbing the unexpected fluctuations in the net-load caused mainly by the stochastic behavior of the produced wind power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207