Characterization of a protein–protein interaction within the SigO–RsoA two-subunit σ factor: the σ70 region 2.3-like segment of RsoA mediates interaction with SigO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
σ factors are single subunit general transcription factors that reversibly bind core RNA polymerase and mediate gene-specific transcription in bacteria. Previously, an atypical two-subunit σ factor was identified that activates transcription from a group of related promoters in Bacillus subtilis. Both of the subunits, named SigO and RsoA, share primary sequence similarity with the canonical σ70 family of σ factors and interact with each other and with RNA polymerase subunits. Here we show that the σ70 region 2.3-like segment of RsoA is unexpectedly sufficient for interaction with the amino-terminus of SigO and the β' subunit. A mutational analysis of RsoA identified aromatic residues conserved amongst all RsoA homologues, and often amongst canonical σ factors, that are particularly important for the SigO-RsoA interaction. In a canonical σ factor, region 2.3 amino acids bind non-template strand DNA, trapping the promoter in a single-stranded state required for initiation of transcription. Accordingly, we speculate that RsoA region 2.3 protein-binding activity likely arose from a motif that, at least in its ancestral protein, participated in DNA-binding interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".