MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2513545923 · doi:10.1109/compsac.2016.108

Enhanced User Security and Privacy Protection in 4G LTE Network

2016· article· en· W2513545923 on OpenAlexaff
Okoye Emmanuel Ekene, Ron Ruhl, Pavol Zavarsky

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer securityPublic key infrastructureAuthentication (law)Public-key cryptographyComputer networkEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the Evolved Packet System Authentication and Key Agreement (EPS-AKA) provides security and privacy enhancements in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), the International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) is sent in clear text in order to obtain service. Various efforts to provide security mechanisms to protect this unique private identity have not resulted in methods implemented to protect the disclosure of the IMSI. The exposure of the IMSI brings risk to user privacy, and knowledge of it can lead to several passive and active attacks targeted at specific IMSI's and their respective users. Further, the Temporary Mobile Subscribers Identity (TMSI) generated by the Authentication Center (AuC) have been found to be prone to rainbow and brute force attacks, hence an attacker who gets hold of the TMSI can be able to perform social engineering in tracing the TMSI to the corresponding IMSI of a User Equipment (UE). This paper proposes a change to the EPS-AKA authentication process in 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) Network by including the use of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The change would result in the IMSI never being released in the clear in an untrusted network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityFrench-language works237,207