MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2513545923 · doi:10.1109/compsac.2016.108

Enhanced User Security and Privacy Protection in 4G LTE Network

2016· article· en· W2513545923 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer securityPublic key infrastructureAuthentication (law)Public-key cryptographyComputer networkEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the Evolved Packet System Authentication and Key Agreement (EPS-AKA) provides security and privacy enhancements in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), the International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) is sent in clear text in order to obtain service. Various efforts to provide security mechanisms to protect this unique private identity have not resulted in methods implemented to protect the disclosure of the IMSI. The exposure of the IMSI brings risk to user privacy, and knowledge of it can lead to several passive and active attacks targeted at specific IMSI's and their respective users. Further, the Temporary Mobile Subscribers Identity (TMSI) generated by the Authentication Center (AuC) have been found to be prone to rainbow and brute force attacks, hence an attacker who gets hold of the TMSI can be able to perform social engineering in tracing the TMSI to the corresponding IMSI of a User Equipment (UE). This paper proposes a change to the EPS-AKA authentication process in 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) Network by including the use of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The change would result in the IMSI never being released in the clear in an untrusted network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it