Jointed pipeline response to tunneling-induced ground deformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the effect of tunneling-induced ground deformation on the response of jointed cast iron and ductile iron pipelines that (i) cross the settlement profile perpendicular to the tunnel centerline and (ii) connect through 90° tees with a pipeline parallel to the tunnel centerline. The modeling involves two-dimensional finite element analyses that account for coupled forces both parallel and perpendicular to the pipeline, and incorporates the results of large-scale laboratory tests to characterize the joints. Pipeline response is quantified with respect to joint rotation and pullout at various leakage levels as well as the allowable tensile strain. The paper describes soil displacements induced by a 6.1 m (20 ft.) diameter tunnel in clay and sand. Joint rotations and maximum tensile strains for pipelines in sand exceed those in clay by up to three for the same geometric conditions. Cast iron pipelines crossing the tunnel centerline are most vulnerable to leakage from joint rotation; ductile iron pipelines have sufficient capacity against joint leakage in all cases studied. Cast iron pipelines that connect with 90° tees are highly vulnerable to leakage from pullout due to lateral soil movement. Guidance is provided for risk assessment, design, and utility operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".