Supplemented Dialysis: Amino Acid-Based Solutions in Peritoneal Dialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis is associated with several metabolic and nutritional abnormalities, some of which are related to the use of glucose-based solutions. Furthermore, the catabolic effects of uremia per se, protein and amino acid losses into the dialysate, peritonitis and poor appetite contribute to amino acid abnormalities, negative nitrogen balance and a high prevalence of malnutrition in peritoneal dialysis patients. To overcome these problems the use of amino acid instead of glucose as an osmotic agent has been proposed. Short-term studies have shown that amino acid-based solutions in peritoneal dialysis may supplement in excess the daily losses of amino acids during dialysis with glucose-based solutions. The amino acid solutions produce similar ultrafiltration and solute transport as the standard glucose solutions although the period of effective ultrafiltration is rather short. However, it should be noted that some studies have reported that the transport of small and large solutes may increase in patients using amino acid solutions. During the early 1980s several investigators have developed and tested different amino acid solutions for peritoneal dialysis. The initial clinical experience from Toronto with amino acid solutions containing large amounts of non-essential amino acids and inadequate amount of buffer were in general discouraging. The patients, who were not always malnourished and tended to have a low energy intake, developed increased BUN levels, acidosis, no improvement in nutritional status or amino acid abnormalities and, in some cases, anorexia. In 1985 a new 1% amino acid solution, containing an increased buffer amount and amino acids (mainly essential) in proportions which take the amino acid abnormalities in uremic patients into account, became available. The use of this solution resulted in some improvement in amino acid pattern and nutritional parameters, but acidosis and increased BUN levels remained problems. The experiences from these and previous studies showed that: (1) the improvement of the composition of amino acid solutions was beneficial; (2) a further increase of the buffer amount was needed; (3) patients included should have signs of protein malnutrition combined with low dietary protein intake to benefit from intraperitoneal amino acid supply, and (4) energy intake should be sufficient to prevent amino acids to end up as energy source. For this purpose a new improved 1.1% amino acid solution has been developed containing a further increase of some essential amino acids and an increased amount of lactate (40 mmol/l). This solution has been tested in malnourished patients eating 0.8 g protein/kg/day and 25-30 kcal/kg/day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".