MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effects of vandetanib on body composition in patients with advanced medullary thyroid carcinomas: Results from a placebo-controlled study.

2012· article· en· W2513984290 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Hélène Massicotte, Isabelle Borget, Sophie Leboulleux, Éric Baudin, Vickie E. Baracos, Mansouriah Merad, Martin Schlumberger, S. Antoun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVandetanibMedicinePlaceboSarcopeniaInternal medicineAdipose tissueUrologyThyroid carcinomaGastroenterologyThyroidEndocrinologyPathologyTyrosine kinaseReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5569 Background: Muscle (MT) and adipose tissue (AT) share common intra cellular pathways with tumor, thus it is not surprising to observe metabolic consequences with targeted therapies. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of vandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), on MT and AT. Methods: 33 patients (25 men and 8 women, mean age of 54 years) with metastatic MTC received vandetanib 300 mg/d (n=23) or placebo (n=10) in the setting of the ZETA study. Cross-sectional areas (cm2) of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and MT were assessed by computed tomography imaging at 3rd lumbar vertebra and were indexed for height (cm2/m2). Comparisons between treatment and placebo were made at 3 months, and long-term evolution was evaluated over 12 months. Results: At 3 months, compared to baseline, patients treated with vandetanib gained 1.5 kg, 1.3 cm2/m2 of MT, 5.1 cm2/m2 of VAT and 4.5 cm2/m2 of SAT. In contrast, patients under placebo lost 1.5 kg (p=0.02), 1.0 cm2/m2 of MT (p=0.009), 5.5 cm2/m2 of SAT (p=0.004) and gained significantly less VAT (0.6 cm2/m2) (p=0.02). At 12 months, compared to baseline, patients treated with vandetanib gained 2 kg (NS), lost 0.3 cm2/m2 MT (NS), gained 3.4 cm2/m2 of VAT (NS) and 8.7 cm2/m2 of SAT (95% CI, 1.1 to 16.2). A significant decrease of calcitonin (defined as ≤50% compared to baseline) was associated with higher weight (p=0.01), VAT (p=0.01), and total adipose tissue (p=0.02). Conclusions: Beyond its proved efficacy in MTC treatment, and despite common intracellular pathways, vandetanib is the only studied TKI to preserve MT and to restore AT. Further research is needed to explore whether the relationship between changes of VAT and vandetanib treatment results from a direct metabolic action of vandetanib or is a consequence of biochemical tumor control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→