Selection of New Barley Advanced Lines Considering Several Agricultural Traits Simultaneously: Comparison of Two Mathematical Procedures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plant breeders often handle large number of plants in a segregating population using limited resources. Therefore, the sooner they can reduce the number of plants to the barest minimum, but more importantly, to the most desirable and promising individuals, the better. The present short report deals with the selection of new advanced barley lines considering several agricultural traits simultaneously. We exemplify two new alternative uses of the Euclidean distance to identify the best 20% plant materials from a gamma radiation-mutant population. Plant height; days to flowering; plant lodging; coefficient of infection with leaf rust (Puccinia hordei), with powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei), with spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus); yield; test weight; grain protein content and 1000 kernel weight were recorded and considered in the simultaneous selections described here. Essentially, selection indexes are proposed to calculate an overall value to a breeders' germplasm based on a number of traits. In reality, for many of the traits listed above, breeders are aiming for acceptable values such as for disease resistance and perhaps some morphological traits. For other traits, such as yield, the breeders are looking for the highest possible value. Therefore, each breeder will have different selection indexes; however, the mathematically defined indexes shown here would be particularly practical for plant breeders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it