MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514116065 · doi:10.1017/s0305004117000500

Squarefree doubly primitive divisors in dynamical sequences

2017· preprint· en· W2514116065 on OpenAlexafffund
Dragos Ghioca, Khoa D. Nguyen, Thomas J. Tucker

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsSquare-free integerCombinatoricsFinite fieldFunction fieldModuloConjectureInteger (computer science)Natural numberPrime numberField (mathematics)Discrete mathematicsPrimitive root modulo nNumber theoryFunction (biology)Valuation (finance)Pure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let K be a number field or a function field of characteristic 0, let φ ∈ K ( z ) with deg( φ ) ⩾ 2, and let α ∈ ℙ 1 ( K ). Let S be a finite set of places of K containing all the archimedean ones and the primes where φ has bad reduction. After excluding all the natural counterexamples, we define a subset A ( φ , α ) of ℤ ⩾0 × ℤ >0 and show that for all but finitely many ( m , n ) ∈ A ( φ , α ) there is a prime 𝔭 ∉ S such that ord 𝔭 ( φ m + n ( α )− φ m ( α )) = 1 and α has portrait ( m , n ) under the action of φ modulo 𝔭. This latter condition implies ord 𝔭 ( φ u + v ( α )− φ u ( α )) ⩽ 0 for ( u , v ) ∈ ℤ ⩾0 × ℤ >0 satisfying u < m or v < n . Our proof assumes a conjecture of Vojta for ℙ 1 × ℙ 1 in the number field case and is unconditional in the function field case thanks to a deep theorem of Yamanoi. This paper extends earlier work of Ingram–Silverman, Faber–Granville and the authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207