MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514361528 · doi:10.1093/ajcp/142.suppl1.261

Clinical Cytology-Pathology Correlation for Diagnosis of Fallopian Tube Prolapse After Hysterectomy

2014· article· en· W2514361528 on OpenAlexaff
Shuying Ji, Cyrille Bicamumpaka, S Saba, Esther Ravinsky, Camelia Stefanovici

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHysterectomyMedicineFallopian tubeCytologyGynecologyAnatomical pathologyPathologyImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Prolapse of the fallopian tube into the vaginal vault is a rare complication that may occur after hysterectomy (incidence cited around 0.1%). The clinical presentation includes abdominal pain, dyspareunia, post coital bleeding, and/or vaginal discharge. However, some rare cases can be asymptomatic and diagnosed at routine checkup. Pap smears alone can sometimes be challenging and diagnosing fallopian tube prolapse by the means of vaginal cytology is an even rarer occurrence. Methods: We present the case a 47-year old woman who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with abdominoperineal repair due to prolapse; the clinician made note of an uncommon pelvic laxity. During a routine postsurgical Pap smear check-up, atypical glandular cells were reported. The result and comment from the signing out pathologist triggered a vaginal colposcopy and a pelvic ultrasound, followed later by bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Results: The postsurgery Pap test showed the presence of atypical glandular cells with morphologic evidence of cilia. The comment mentioned prolapse of the fallopian tube into vagina. The follow-up colposcopy showed tissue at vaginal vault suspicious for fallopian tube prolapse. The biopsied tissue showed polypoid fragments of stroma and ciliated glandular epithelium, consistent with prolapsed fallopian tube. A transabdominal and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound was done that showed unremarkable ovaries; the fallopian tubes were not visualized. Laparotomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. The specimen showed fallopian tubes with reactive type changes (marked chronic salpingitis and mesothelial hyperplasia) and no evidence of atypia or malignancy. Conclusions: The cytologic diagnosis of fallopian tube prolapse will be challenging without clinical history and definitive histological assessment. The differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Pap smears, particularly atypical ciliated glandular cells, includes vaginal adenosis, endometriosis, primary or metastatic adenocarcinoma, vesicovaginal and uterovaginal fistulae and granulation tissue related to surgery. Fallopian tube prolapse should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the post-hysterectomy cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical PathologySame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207