O CONCÍLIO VATICANO II: APONTAMENTOS BIBLIOGRÁFICOS PARA UM ESTUDO HISTORIOGRÁFICO
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Os estudos historiográficos sobre o maior evento do cristianismo no século XX, o Concílio Vaticano II (1962-1965), ainda dão seus primeiros passos no Brasil. Partindo desse pressuposto, este artigo tem como objetivo principal revisitar uma bibliografia fundamental para as realizações deste tipo de estudos, além de apresentar um breve adendo hermenêutico sobre a interpretação do evento conciliar.ABSTRACT: The historiographical studies on the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), the biggest event of Christianity in the twentieth century, still take their first steps in Brazil. From that perspective, this paperÊs main objective is to revisit a basic bibliography for the achievement of such studies, and also present a brief hermeneutic addendum on the interpretation of the councilor event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it