MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Delays in the Emergency Department, Medical Complications of Stroke and Predictors of Clinical Outcomes: The McGill Experience (P2.310)

2016· article· en· W2514783331 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bing‐Yu Chen, Robert Côté, Lucy Vieira, Lo Benjamin, Catherine Legault

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency departmentMedicineStroke (engine)Emergency medicineMedical emergencyIntensive care medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Canadian Best Practice Stroke Guidelines state that acute stroke patients should be admitted within 4 hours to a stroke unit. The objectives of our study were to assess current delays in our emergency department (ED), medical complications in ED and during stroke unit admission, and predictors of clinical outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients (n=353) admitted with ischemic strokes from January 2011 to March 2014 at Montreal General Hospital and Montreal Neurological Hospital. We assessed the length of stay in ED, medical complications in ED and during admission, modified Rankin Scales (mRS) at discharge and survival. Correlation between both functional outcome and survival and risk factors was evaluated using adjusted odds ratios (OR) and standardized B coefficient (β), with associated p values. Results: Delays in ED were 22.5 hours in average with a median of 13.8 hours. The overall rate of medical complications in the ED was 14[percnt], the most common being delirium and urinary tract infection. Complications during admission occur in 46.7[percnt] of stroke patients, with pneumonia, urinary tract infection and delirium being the most common. Worse functional outcome was correlated with increasing age (β=0.2, p<0.01), development of pneumonia during admission (β=0.1, p=0.04) and presence of brain edema during admission (β=0.2,p<0.01). Increased risk of death was correlated with pneumonia in ED (OR=26, p500, p<0.01) and sepsis during admission (OR=27, p=0.01). Conclusions: This preliminary analysis of our cohort reveals that there is a significant delay in the admission of patients from the ED to the stroke unit, and that this delay is not in keeping with current Canadian Stroke Best Practice guidelines. Medical complications were prevalent, and pneumonia, brain edema and sepsis during admission were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Further work will explore the correlation between delays in ED, medical complications and clinical outcomes. Conclusions:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→