Combined Surface Activated Bonding Technique for Hydrophilic SiO<sub>2</sub>-SiO<sub>2</sub> and Cu-Cu Bonding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wafer bonding with high quality (such as high strength, void-less interface, and low-resistance vertical electrical interconnects) obtained at low temperatures is highly desired for 3D integration of microsystems. This paper reports a combined surface activated bonding (SAB) technique for improvement of the bonding quality of SiO2-SiO2 pairs bonded at 200°C. The present bonding technique employs a combination of surface irradiation using a Si-containing Ar beam and prebonding attach-detach procedure prior to bonding in vacuum, followed by postbonding annealing in ambient pressure. The bonding method has also been found effective for SiO2-SiNx and Cu-Cu bonding at 200°C. Results of bonding strength measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) observations are reported and discussed to understand the present technique. The feasibility of this bonding technique for Cu/SiO2 and Cu/SiO2/SiNx hybrid bonding is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".