MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514978986 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.571.571

Disruptive ARID1A Mutations in Follicular Lymphoma Impair DNA Repair Efficiency and Are Associated with Favorable Outcome in Patients Receiving First-Line Immunochemotherapy

2015· article· en· W2514978986 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak Bararia, Michael Heide, Robert S. Welner, T Romashova, Alessandro Pastore, Radhika Mathur, Randy D. Gascoyne, Robert Kridel, B. Willson, Charles W.M. Roberts, Wolfgang Hiddemann, David M. Weinstock, Oliver Weigert

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsARID1AFollicular lymphomaLymphomaCancer researchInternal medicineOncologyMedicineAggressive lymphomaMutationBiologyImmunologyRituximabGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Follicular lymphoma (FL) is among the most common lymphomas worldwide and considered incurable for the majority of patients who present with advanced disease. FL is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease. We have recently established a clinicogenetic risk model (m7-FLIPI) that integrates the mutation status of 7 genes, including ARID1A, into a predictive algorithm for improved risk stratification for failure-free survival in patients receiving first-line immunochemotherapy (Pastore et al., Lancet Oncology 2015). When adjusted for FLIPI and ECOG performance status, the presence of ARID1A mutations correlated with longer failure-free survival (HR 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-7.27; p=0.049) in patients receiving first-line R-CHOP. The underlying molecular mechanism for better treatment outcome of patients with ARID1A mutated FL is unclear. ARID1A is a member of SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling complex. Evolving evidence indicates that the SWI/SNF complex functions as a tumor suppressor and is implicated in DNA damage repair. ARID1Ais the most commonly mutated SWI/SNF complex member in FL: in our series, we identified 44 ARID1A mutations in 304 FL cases (14%). These mutations were primarily heterozygous and disruptive (66%), another 6 cases harbored splice site mutations. Primary patient samples and lymphoma cell lines that harbored ARID1A mutations (e.g., SU-DHL5, WSU-FSCCL, Namalwa) were had lower ARID1A protein expression as compared to ARID1A wild type (wt) t(14;18)-positive lymphoma cell lines (OCI-Ly1, -Ly8, DB). Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) has been reported to be the predominant pathway of DNA double strand break (DSB) repair in FL (Koues et al., Immunity 2015) and is indispensible for successful VDJ rearrangement during early B-cell maturation.To analyze the impact of Arid1a disruption on B-cell maturation in vivo, we used a conditional Arid1a knock-out mouse model (Arid1af/f; Gao, PNAS 2008). 8-10 week old Mx1-Cre+Arid1af/f mice and control (Mx1-Cre-Arid1af/f) mice were treated with poly(IC). Bone marrow (BM) were harvested from these animals 14 days later. Conditionally deletion of Arid1a (n=3) resulted in severely impaired B-cell maturation in BM cells affecting Hardy fractions B/C though F. E.g., flow cytometric analysis showed that the frequency of fraction C (B220+ CD43+ HSA+ BP-1+) was greatly reduced in BM from Mx1-Cre+Arid1af/f vs in the control group (0.1 % vs 1.2 %, n=3), consistent with the inability to successfully complete VDJ recombination. As a proof-of-principle experiment we assayed the impact of Arid1a loss on DSB repair efficiency using mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) from either wt or conditional Arid1a knock-out mice. MEFs were irradiated with 2 Gy 36 hrs after retroviral transduction with Cre and stained for γH2A.X and 53BP1 to assay for NHEJ. In three independent and blinded experiments, evaluation of >100 cells per condition demonstrated significantly more double-positive cells (>6 foci/cell) in Arid1a-/- MEFs (43+/-14%) compared to both Arid1af/f MEFs (9+/-1%) and Cre-exposed wt MEFs (15+/-5%) at 16 hrs post irradiation, whereas there was no significant difference for Arid1af/f or wt MEFs with or without Cre at baseline (all <10%), and 1 hr post irradiation (all >50%). ARID1A haplodeficient lymphoma cell lines (SU-DHL5, WSU-FSCCL, Namalwa) were 10-100 fold more sensitive to the DSB inducing doxorubicin treatment compared to ARID1A wt lymphoma cell lines (OCI-Ly1, -Ly8, DB). Tet-induced shRNA knock-down (via pTRIPZ vectors) of endogenous ARID1A in two t(14;18)-positive lymphoma cell lines with wt ARID1A (OCI-Ly1 and OCI-Ly8) doubled the number of NHEJ foci by 53-BP1 staining in two independent experiments. Furthermore, shRNA knock-down of ARID1A resulted in increased sensitivity to doxorubicine (IC50 <10 nM) in OCI-Ly8 cell lines as compared to 25 nM for scrambled shRNA. We conclude that ARID1A is recurrently and significantly mutated in FL. Most mutations are disruptive and result in functionally relevant ARID1A protein loss. ARID1A disruption slows the repair kinetics of NHEJ and delays the clearance of DSB both in a genetically clean MEF model and in t(14;18)-positive lymphoma cell lines. As a result, ARID1A loss might underlie the genomic instability of FL, but -at the same time- sensitize tumors to DNA damaging agents and irradiation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207