MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515236883 · doi:10.1080/02678292.2016.1209791

Synthesis and characterisation of two homologous series of LC acrylic monomers based on phenolic and resorcinic azobenzene groups

2016· article· en· W2515236883 on OpenAlexaff
Patricio Romero-Hasler, A. E. Fierro-Armijo, Eduardo Soto‐Bustamante, Ariel Meneses-Franco

Bibliographic record

VenueLiquid Crystals · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
KeywordsDifferential scanning calorimetryAzobenzeneHomologous seriesMonomerMaterials scienceLiquid crystalPhase (matter)Alkoxy groupCrystallographyOptical microscopePolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerScanning electron microscopeComposite materialChemistryAlkylThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis and phase characterisation of two homologous series of monomers of acrylic azo-compounds has been presented. The characterisation comprises polarising optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and powder X-ray diffractometry (PXRD). All studied monomers exhibit a narrow nematic phase with decrease in temperature range while increasing the alkoxy tail length. For the resorcinic azo benzenes at higher tail lengths, SmA and SmC phases are present. Phenolic azo compounds show only SmA phase. The resorcinic family showed more stable phases, with broader liquid crystalline temperature range than its phenolic equivalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiquid CrystalsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207