Behavior of α‐synuclein–drug complexes during nanopore analysis with a superimposed AC field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seven α-synuclein-drug complexes have been studied by nanopore analysis in which an AC field of 200 mV from 10 MHz to 1 GHz has been superimposed on the standard electrophoretic DC voltage of 100 mV. α-Synuclein has a large dipole moment and in the absence of drug the AC field causes the molecule to oscillate at the entrance to the pore and reduces its ability to translocate through the pore. Thus more bumping events are observed in the current blockade histograms. The binding of drugs to α-synuclein has a large effect on the event profiles depending on the region of α-synuclein to which the drugs bind. Caffeine and (-)-nicotine bind both the N- and C-termini causing the protein to adopt a loop conformation that allows translocation even in the AC field. Metformin, which binds only to the C-terminus also facilitates translocation. For these drugs there is good evidence that the AC field is causing the complex to dissociate as it enters the pore that has not been observed previously. In contrast, complexes with (+)-amphetamine that has an N-terminal binding site and cocaine that binds to the central region of the protein, show only small changes in the event profiles in an AC field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".