Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 35-year-old woman underwent a caesarean at 39 weeks and 6 days of her pregnancy. The operation was done without complications. Over the next days, the patient complained about abdominal bloating and nausea. Clinical examination noted a decrease in peristalsis. The biological analysis showed an inflammatory syndrome with a C-Reactive Protein (CRP) level of 143 mg/L and hyperneutrophilia up to 13930/μl. Abdominal contrastenhanced Computed Tomography (CT) was performed and revealed distension (with air-fluid levels) of the stomach, the small bowel and both ascending and transverse colon (Figure 1). The descending and sigmoid colons showed no sign of distension. No transitional mechanical obstacle could be found. Furthermore, the presence of a pneumoperitoneum was to be seen in the light of the history of her recent caesarean section. The diameter of the caecum was 11 cm. Post caesarean Ogilvie’s syndrome was suspected and consecutively colonoscopy was carried out three days after delivery. It showed dilation of the transverse and right colonic lumen for which exsufflation was accomplished. There was an ulcerated and necrotic layer in the lower caecum towards the hepatic flexure of the colon. A close biological and clinical monitoring was recommended. The next day, the patient still complained about abdominal bloating. A plain abdominal X-ray showed an significant pneumoperitoneum and hydroaeric levels in the intestines (Figure 2). The patient underwent right hemicolectomy; anatomopathology revealed ceacal wall necrosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it