MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515531025 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/53/4101

Vertical Oxide Thin-Film Transistor with Solution-Processed Channel Define Layer

2016· article· en· W2515531025 on OpenAlexaff
Seung Hee Lee, Hye‐In Yeom, Joon Yong Choe, Chi‐Sun Hwang, Sang‐Hee Ko Park

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin-film transistorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsChannel (broadcasting)TransistorLayer (electronics)AMOLEDOxide thin-film transistorProcess (computing)Active matrixElectrical engineeringNanotechnologyComputer scienceEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High performance thin-film transistor (TFT) is essential for the next-generation display. Especially, scale-downed TFT becomes very important to develop high resolution display. The vertical-channel TFTs (V-TFTs) attracts lots of interests from the view point of minimizing pixel size because V-TFTs have very small footprint compared to the lateral TFT. V-TFTs provide the smallest pixel size without the limitation of channel length. [1] In addition, V-TFTs could show high strain stress stability due to the small channel size formed vertically when they are adapted in flexible display. Channel length of V-TFTs is controlled by the thickness of spacer placed between source and drain. Since the main purpose of adoption of V-TFTs is to increase the current driving ability, typical channel length of V-TFT is shorter than 1 um (~0.5 um). The length of channel in vertical TFT, however, should be adjustable according to the TFT applications. The major method to deposit spacer which determine the channel length (channel define layer) is vacuum process such as plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Such vacuum process could provide high film performance, quality and good uniformity. Nonetheless, vacuum process has disadvantage in the deposition of spacer with thick thickness because of very long process time. In contrast, solution-process coating is easy and fast method. By controlling coating speed and time, solution process provides thick films uniformly. Furthermore, solution process can be applied using both of organic and inorganic materials. While inorganic materials result in films with low defects, the space processed with organic materials yields low stress, making this suitable for the flexible vertical TFTs. In this study, we fabricate vertical TFT with spacers deposited with various materials such as organic and inorganic by solution-process coating. We also investigate back-channel effect and TFT strain stress depending on the kinds of spacer materials. We select three different types of materials for the spacer; SiO 2 , PI, carbon based organic material. Solution-processed SiO 2 film have dielectric constant of 4.27 and similar film quality with PECVD SiO 2 . The solution-processed films show very low leakage current of 1.35x10 -9 A/cm -2 at 0.1MV/cm. Carbon based organic material also has low dielectric constant and is approximately 1um~3um thick. We studied the effect of back-channel according to various spacer materials. Instead of V-TFTs, top gate staggered TFTs were fabricated to mimic the structure of V-TFT because both TFTs have same process sequence. Figure 1(a) shows the schematic structure of top-gate TFT. The various buffer layers corresponding to the spacer in V-TFT were deposited by solution processes. The TFT with solution-processed film did not show degradation of electrical characteristics in comparison to that with PECVD SiO 2 . After confirming the feasibility of solution-processed spacer for the vertical TFT, three types of solution-processed layer are applied to actual vertical TFT as a spacer. The patterned source ITO electrode was coated with solution processed spacer, followed by the deposition of drain electrode. Drain and spacer were patterned with spacer mask. In sequence, active, gate insulator and gate are deposited and patterned at once. We will report the performance of V-TFTs with solution processed spacer in terms of mobility, stability, and thermal stability. Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of top-gate TFT, (b) Schematic structure of vertical TFT with solution processed spacer Acknowledgements This work was supported by 'The Cross-Ministry Giga KOREA Project' grant from the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Korea [GK15D0100]. References [1]. Chi-Sun Hwang, Sang-Hee Ko Park, Himchan Oh, Min-Ki Ryu, and Sung-Min Yoon, IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE L, VOL. 35, NO. 3, p360-362, (2014) Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207