MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515586192 · doi:10.1094/pdis-06-16-0792-re

<i>Blueberry fruit drop-associated virus</i>: A New Member of the Family <i>Caulimoviridae</i> Isolated From Blueberry Exhibiting Fruit-Drop Symptoms

2016· article· en· W2515586192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alfredo Díaz-Lara, Robert R. Martín

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceOregon Blueberry CommissionEscuela Superior Politécnica del LitoralU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBiologyRolling circle replicationGenomeHorticultureVirusDrop (telecommunication)BotanyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes the nucleotide sequence and genome organization of a new DNA virus isolated from 'Bluecrop' blueberry plants exhibiting fruit-drop symptoms and named Blueberry fruit drop-associated virus (BFDaV). Blueberry fruit drop disease was first detected in blueberry plants in British Columbia, Canada in the late 1990s, and in a single field in northern Washington state in the United States in 2012. Infected bushes abort nearly 100% of their fruit about three weeks prior to harvest, when the berries are about 3 to 5 mm in diameter. At harvest, the affected plants appear taller than healthy ones as there is no fruit weighing down the branches. The virus was amplified from diseased material using rolling circle amplification, followed by enzyme digestion, cloning, and sequencing. The full genome of BFDaV is 9,850 bp in length and contains a single open reading frame, encoding for a polyprotein, and a large noncoding region. Based on the genome size and organization and phylogenetics, BFDaV is proposed as a new and the largest member of family Caulimoviridae. Finally, in mapping part of a field with fruit-drop symptoms, there was a nearly perfect correlation between the presence of the virus and fruit-drop symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207