MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515837680

Practice tip: Blood sampling boars

2006· article· en· W2515837680 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cate Dewey, Susy Carman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Swine Health and Production · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusBOARSemenBlood collectionBlood samplingMedicineBiologyVeterinary medicineVirologyAnimal scienceGynecologyAndrologyVirusInternal medicineEmergency medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure 2: Wait until the boar begins to ejaculate. Figure 3: Hold off the ear vein until it becomes obvious. ELISA test. Instead of swabs, the 500-μL serum collection tubes produced by Sarstedt (Microvette 500 with serum clotting activator, Catalogue #20.1343.100; Sarstedt Inc, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) were perfect for our use. They provided suffi cient serum for the two tests and were easy to use in the fi eld. Our methods are described and illustrated in Figures 1 through 6. At the laboratory, centrifuge the vial in a microcentifuge to harvest 250 to 500 μL of serum. References *1. Reicks DL. An overview of blood collection strategies for boar studs. Iowa State University 13th Annual Swine Disease Conference for Swine Practitioners. Ames, Iowa; 2005. 2. Reicks DL, Munoz-Zanzi C, Rossow K. Sampling of adult boars during early infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by polymerase chain reaction using a new blood collection technique (blood-swab method). J Swine Health Prod. 2006;14:258-264.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Swine Health and ProductionSame topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207