The role of substituents in the HERON reaction of anomeric amides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anomeric amides, RCON(X)(Y), have two electronegative atoms at the amide nitrogen, a configuration that results in greatly reduced amide resonance and strongly pyramidal nitrogen atoms. This, combined with facilitation of anomeric interactions, can result in the HERON reaction, an intramolecular migration of the more electronegative atom, X, from nitrogen to the carbonyl with production of a Y-stabilised nitrene. We have modelled, at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level, a variety of anomeric amides that undergo the HERON reaction to determine factors that underpin the process. The overriding driving force is anomeric destabilisation of the bond to the migrating group. Rotated transition states show loss of residual resonance and this is a component of the overall activation energies. However, the reduced resonance in these systems plays only a minor role. We have determined the resonance energies (RE) and HERON activation barriers (EA) of five anomeric systems. REs for the amides have been calculated isodesmically using our calibrated trans amidation method and COSNAR calculations. Reduction of their overall EAs by the corresponding RE gives rearrangement energies (Erearr.), a measure of relative impact on rearrangement of substituents on nitrogen. In CH3CON(OMe)(Y) systems producing (CH3CO2Me + NY), a loosely bound electron pair on the donor atom, Y, in nY–σ*NOMe anomeric interactions drives the reaction. Erearr. increases in the sequence Y = N(nitrene) < O−(oxide) ≪ NMe2 < SMe ≪ OMe. For the same systems, RE increases in the order Y = N < O− ≪ OMe ≪ NMe2 ∼ SMe. Other effects such as molecular conformation, nature of the migrating group, X, and acyl substituents at the carbonyl carbon are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".