MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516258115 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2016.2602863

QoS-Aware Throughput Maximization in Wireless Powered Underground Sensor Networks

2016· article· en· W2516258115 on OpenAlexaff
Guanghua Liu, Zehua Wang, Tao Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQuality of serviceComputer scienceThroughputOptimization problemReliability (semiconductor)WirelessComputer networkWireless sensor networkResource allocationConvex optimizationMaximizationDistributed computingReal-time computingMathematical optimizationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the optimal resource allocation in the wireless powered underground sensor network (WPUSN) for throughput maximization. The WPUSN is a new networking paradigm where underground sensors can be replenished by a radio frequency energy harvesting technique and transmit geological data to the nearby aboveground access point in real time. In this paradigm, the underground portion of the wireless communication link suffers from severe path loss. Moreover, different underground sensors may have diverse data traffic demands. In this paper, we formulate an optimization problem to maximize the throughput in WPUSNs with the quality of service (QoS) consideration in terms of communication reliability and diverse data traffic demands. Specifically, we map the QoS requirements to signal-to-noise ratio thresholds and transform our problem into a convex optimization problem with linear constraints. We then present a closed-form solution for the transformed problem through a problem decomposition of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. Our closed-form solution uncovers the insights that how the wireless channel states, reliability requirements, and data traffic demands affect the optimal resource allocation in the WPUSN. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme by running simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207