QoS-Aware Throughput Maximization in Wireless Powered Underground Sensor Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the optimal resource allocation in the wireless powered underground sensor network (WPUSN) for throughput maximization. The WPUSN is a new networking paradigm where underground sensors can be replenished by a radio frequency energy harvesting technique and transmit geological data to the nearby aboveground access point in real time. In this paradigm, the underground portion of the wireless communication link suffers from severe path loss. Moreover, different underground sensors may have diverse data traffic demands. In this paper, we formulate an optimization problem to maximize the throughput in WPUSNs with the quality of service (QoS) consideration in terms of communication reliability and diverse data traffic demands. Specifically, we map the QoS requirements to signal-to-noise ratio thresholds and transform our problem into a convex optimization problem with linear constraints. We then present a closed-form solution for the transformed problem through a problem decomposition of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. Our closed-form solution uncovers the insights that how the wireless channel states, reliability requirements, and data traffic demands affect the optimal resource allocation in the WPUSN. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme by running simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".