Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article analyzes the economic and cultural relationship between the British landowning class and the Argentine estancieros (large property own- ers) in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and explores some explanations for the influence of the former over the latter. It argues that for much of the nineteenth century, the example of the British rural order largely failed to ap- peal to the estancieros , and that it was only during the last quarter of the cen- tury that Argentine landowners became increasingly attracted to British farm technology and to the lifestyle of their British counterparts. Finally, it analyzes the reasons why the British example became increasingly irrelevant in twenti- eth-century Argentina. This article shows that the changing influence of the British landed order over the pampean estancieros is a phenomenon that mer- its historical exploration, for it reveals broad social transformations that have taken place in Great Britain as well as in Argentina. Resume. Cet article analyse les relations economiques et culturelles entre la classe terrienne britannique et les estancieros (grands proprietaires fonciers) de lArgentine aux dix-neuvieme et vingtieme siecles. On avance d'abord que, durant la majeure partie du dix-neuvieme siecle, l'exemple de l'ordre rural bri- tannique ne suscite pas d'interet chez les estancieros. Ce ne sera que durant le dernier quart de ce siecle que les proprietaires terriens argentins commence- ront a adopter la technologie agricole, ainsi que le style de vie de leurs vis-a- vis britanniques. L'article examine ensuite les raisons pour lesquelles l'exem-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".