MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516411963

Anaerobic digestion of poultry manure: Implementation of ammonia control to optimize biogas yield

2016· dissertation· en· W2516411963 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cameron Farrow

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsAnaerobic digestionBiogasYield (engineering)ManureAmmoniaDigestion (alchemy)Biogas productionBiotechnologyEnvironmental scienceWaste managementAgronomyPulp and paper industryChemistryEngineeringBiologyMethaneMaterials scienceBiochemistryChromatography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anaerobic digestion of poultry manure has been historically challenging, and infrequently implemented on a full scale, due to the high total solids (TS) and high ammonia content of the substrate. Conventional digestion processes require extensive substrate dilution in order to employ liquid-phase pumping systems and reduce the risk of ammonia accumulation. The necessary substrate dilutions result in an economically infeasible process. Anaerobic leaching bed reactors (ALBRs), coupled with a strategy for ammonia removal, provide a solution to both issues. ALBRs are utilized to maintain digester homogeneity without an active mixing regime. Struvite precipitation is employed concurrently with digestion to reduce total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) and prevent inhibition of methanogenic archaea. Nutrient distribution is achieved by recirculation of the percolate through the substrate, enabling the utilization of high solids feedstocks. Partitioning leachate from the bulk substrate allows ammonia removal methodologies to be employed without disturbing anaerobic archaea. Investigations reported herein characterize the influence of moisture content, TAN and temperature on biogas yield during poultry manure digestion. High solids digestion is shown to be most efficient in mesophilic temperature ranges with influent total solids (TS) between 15% and 25%. Digestion at thermophilic temperatures demonstrates increased ammonia inhibition, in contrast to mesophilic digestion. Co-digestion of poultry manure with grease and corn silage demonstrate increased biogas yields of 22% and 44%, respectively, in comparison to digestion of poultry manure alone. The impact of phosphate and magnesium additives, pH, temperature and the N:Mg:P molar ratio on struvite precipitation efficacy are quantified. Magnesium chloride (MgCl2·6H2O) and monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) are shown to be the most efficient combination of additives for TAN reduction of poultry manure leachate under neutral reaction conditions. Precipitation is shown to progress efficiently at a pH of seven, in contrast to the commonly reported optimum of nine. Thus allowing leachate treatment without disturbing the microbial consortium. Results reported herein evidence an increase in biogas yield of 30% during batch digestion trials and an increase of 235% during semi-continuous trials, when employing struvite precipitation methodologies. Methane content of the biogas is also shown to increase significantly (p<0.05), when employing struvite precipitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207