MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Availability and Intake of Foods with Naturally Occurring or Added Vitamin D in a Setting of High Vitamin D Deficiency

2015· article· en· W2516658449 on OpenAlexaff
Morgan Cooper, Abdullah Al Mahmud, Daniel Roth, Alison D. Gernand

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Institutes of HealthBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsFortified FoodVitaminFood scienceMedicineFortificationDietary Reference IntakeVitamin D and neurologyPregnancyNutrientEnvironmental healthBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitamin D deficiency is common during pregnancy in Bangladesh. We aimed to examine availability and intake of foods with naturally occurring or added vitamin D in pregnant women in an urban, low income setting. We examined baseline data from an ongoing, 5‐arm, randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation enrolling pregnant women at 17 to 24 weeks gestation in in Dhaka, Bangladesh (n=319; “MDIG” Trial goal n=1300, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01924013). A focused, semi‐quantitative food frequency questionnaire was used to estimate dietary intake of foods containing vitamin D and potentially fortified with vitamin D in the past month. Further, local food markets were visited to document the availability of vitamin D fortified foods. Median (IQR) fish intake was 2.6 (1.3, 4.6) times per week, with only 5% of women reporting no fish intake (Table 1). Fresh milk was commonly consumed (21% drank once per day) but powdered milk was not (80% never consumed). In market analysis, the only locally available, packaged foods labeled as vitamin D fortified were powdered milk and ice cream. Fresh milk, cheese, yogurt, breakfast cereals, and crackers were not vitamin D fortified. Powdered milk was widely available; we identified 13 different powdered milk products (Table 2). All were vitamin D fortified, yet only 3 products indicated 100 IU or more per serving (approximate amount in one serving of milk in the US). Promoting use of powdered milk and fortifying fresh milk should be explored as practical ways to improve vitamin D intake in pregnant women in Bangladesh Support Gates Foundation (OPP1066764) and NIH BIRCWH award (K12HD055882). Table 1. Prevalence of food intake in pregnant women for foods with naturally occurring or added vitamin D, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2014 (n=319). No. of pregnant women self‐reporting intake over past month Never < once per week Once per week 2‐6 times per week Once per day > once per day Food n (%) Milk, fresh 1 60 (18.8) 83 (26.0) 19 (6.0) 88 (27.6) 68 (21.3) 1 (0.3) Powdered milk 1 254 (79.6) 19 (6.0) 10 (3.1) 15 (4.7) 17 (5.3) 4 (1.3) Yogurt 1 159 (49.8) 138 (43.3) 16 (5.0) 6 (1.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) Ice cream 104 (32.6) 144 (45.1) 27 (8.5) 39 (12.2) 4 (1.3) 1 (0.3) Cheese 293 (91.9) 23 (7.2) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) Egg 29 (9.0) 61 (19.1) 36 (11.3) 128 (40.1) 62 (19.4) 3 (0.9) Poultry 51 (16.0) 121 (37.9) 62 (19.4) 82 (25.7) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.3) Beef/Mutton/Pork 56 (17.6) 122 (38.2) 57 (17.9) 81 (25.4) 3 (0.9) 0 (0) Organ meats 183 (57.4) 114 (35.7) 13 (4.1) 7 (2.2) 2 (0.6) 0 (0) Fish (fresh or dried) 17 (5.3) 45 (14.1) 76 (23.8) 133 (41.7) 25 (7.8) 23 (7.2) 1 Trace amount of vitamin D naturally occurring per the Food Composition Table for Bangladesh, 1 st Edition, University of Dhaka, June 2013. Table 2. Vitamin D content and cost of powdered milk products in Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2014. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207