Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recolonisation par migration de l'echinide Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) dans une communaute a , forte couverture algale et faibles densites d'oursins. Nous avons examine la recolonisation de zones experimentales apres les avoir degagees artificiellement de tous les specimens Paracentrotus lividus. Notre but etait de mimer un prelevement normal de peche et d'examiner a quelle vitesse les peuplements d'oursins peuvent recoloniser l'habitat. Nous avons choisi une communaute ou la densite des oursins etait faible (2 ind.m- 2 environ) et la couverture algale bien developpee. Ces conditions sont typiques du biotope sublittoral rocheux mediterraneen au-dessous de 4-6 m de profondeur. L'accessibilite de chaque zone par mouvement lateral des oursins etait differente. Dans ces circonstances, la recolonisation est tres lente; la zone la plus accessible est la seule a avoir recupere la densite initiale d'oursins en 18 mois, tandis que la zone la moins accessible ne retrouve, apres quatre ans et demi, qu'une densite de seulement 46 % de la densite initiale. La croissance in situ de nouvelles recrues, plutot que la migration laterale, est probablement responsable des taux de recolonisation observes dans les zones isolees. En conclusion. l'extraction de cette espece peut avoir des effets de longue duree sur les peuplements locaux, ce qui a, en retour, un effet sur les communautes algales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".