MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517057369 · doi:10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.49

Abstract 49: Cerebral Microbleeds are Associated With Incident Dementia: The Framingham Heart Study

2016· article· en· W2517057369 on OpenAlexaff
José R. Romero, Alexa Beiser, Jayandra J. Himali, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Charles DeCarli, Philip A. Wolf, Sudha Seshadri

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDementiaFramingham Heart StudyCerebral amyloid angiopathyInternal medicineCohortCardiologyFramingham Risk ScoreProportional hazards modelStroke (engine)Cohort studyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: CMB represent hemorrhage-prone small vessel disease (SVD), attributed to hypertensive vasculopathy or cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). CMB are associated with adverse outcomes including prevalent stroke and dementia, but the relation with incident dementia in the community has not been studied. Objective: To study the association of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) on MRI and incidence of dementia in a community based cohort. Methods: We evaluated 1296 dementia-free Framingham Original and Offspring Cohort participants (mean age 72years; 54% women) with available brain MRI and incident dementia data (mean follow-up 6.7 years). Using Cox-proportional hazards models we related all CMB and CMB stratified by brain location to incident dementia. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, APOE status, and education, with additional models adjusting for vascular risk factors and MRI markers of ischemic SVD. Results: CMB were observed in 10.8% of subjects (64% lobar, 36% deep and mixed). Incident dementia was observed in 85 participants (6.6% over study period). We observed a 1.74 times higher risk of dementia in participants with any CMB (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.00-3.01), and three fold higher risk in those with deep and/or mixed CMB (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.52-5.90). The associations remained significant after adjusting for vascular risk factors. Although they were attenuated after adjustment for MRI markers of ischemic SVD, they remained significant for participants with deep and/or mixed CMB (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.22-4.88). Purely lobar CMB were not associated with incident dementia. Conclusions: CMB were associated with increased risk of incident dementia, and for non-lobar CMB, the associations were independent of vascular risk factors and ischemic markers of small vessel disease. Our findings support a role for hypertensive vasculopathy and the interplay of hypertensive and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in risk of dementia, and highlight the role of CMB as markers of adverse neurological outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207