Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta analise comparativa opoe as nocoes de virtude acabada e de vicio acabado segundo as tres modalidades fundadas sobre as significacoes do termo teleios retiradas da Metafisica A„, 16. Assim, enquanto 'acabado' e comprendido, por um lado, no sentido de 'completo' e, no outro, no sentido de 'perfeito', o autor sustenta que a oposicao e ilustrada nos dois casos -- mas por razoes diferentes -- pelos estados de justica e de injustica geral. Quando 'acabado' significa mais propriamente 'final', sao a sabedoria e a intemperanca que desempenham o papel de contrarios. Esses tres tipos de contraste correspondem, por outro lado, a representacao aristotelica da felicidade e da infelicidade humanas. Abstract This comparative analysis opposes the notions of accomplished virtue and accomplished vice according to the three modalities which are based on the meanings of the term teleios extracted from the Metaphysics A„, 16. Thus, whereas, on one hand, one understands 'accomplished' in the sense of 'complete' and, on the other hand, in the sense of 'perfect', the author sustains that in both senses the opposition is elucidated -- though for different reasons - by the general states of justice and injustice. When 'accomplished' means 'final', wisdom and intemperance play the role of contraries. These three kinds of contrast correspond, on the other hand, to the Aristotelian representation of human happiness and unhappiness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".