Изменение структуры и функций подразделений Хозяйственного департамента Финляндского Сената в 1888 году
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of administrative development in the Great Duchy of Finland in the last quarter of the XIX century. By that time the Standing Orders of the Governmental Council of Finland of 1809 became significantly obsolete, and it was necessary to renovate them. That is why during the reign of Alexander the III some administrative reforms were undertaken. They resulted in partial alteration of the structure and functions of the Economic (Internal Home Management) department of the Finnish Senate. Although these reforms did not solve all the problems of Duchy’s administrative government, they were an important stage of gradual transformation of the governmental system into Finland’s ministerial system. The Finnish Senate began to settle the problems of the princedom management independently, without any confirmation from the Monarch. The number of structural sections of the Senate increased and their competence grew up. Finish bureaucracy became completely dependent from the Finland’s Senate. As a result the system of authority in Finland became stronger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it