MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517285434 · doi:10.1111/jon.12383

Topographic Assessment of Acute Ischemic Changes for Prognostication of Anterior Circulation Stroke

2016· article· en· W2517285434 on OpenAlex
Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Siamak Noorbaloochi, Adnan I. Qureshi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroimaging · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCirculation (fluid dynamics)Stroke (engine)CardiologyIschemic strokeAcute strokeInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The location of acute ischemic infarct can affect the clinical outcome of stroke patients. We aimed to develop a prognostic tool based on the topographic distribution of early ischemic changes on admission computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Using the albumin in acute stroke (ALIAS) trials dataset, patients with anterior circulation stroke were included for analysis. A 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRs) score > 2 defined disability/death; and ≤2 defined favorable outcome. A penalized logistic regression determined independent predictors of disability/death among components of admission CT scan Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS). Follow-up 24-hour CT/MRI scans were reviewed for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). RESULTS: A simplified ASPECTS (sASPECTS) was developed including the caudate, lentiform nucleus, insula, and M5 components of ASPECTS-which were independent predictors of disability/death on multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference between ASPECTS and sASPECTS in prediction of disability/death (P = .738). Among patients with sASPECTS ≥ 1, the rate of favorable outcome was higher in those with intravenous (IV) thrombolytic therapy (501/837, 59.9%) versus those without treatment (91/183, 49.7%, P = .013); whereas among patients with sASPECTS of 0, IV thrombolysis was not associated with improved outcome. Also, patients with sASPECTS of 0 were more likely to develop symptomatic ICH (odds ratio = 2.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.49-4.62), compared to those with sASPECTS ≥ 1 (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Topographic assessment of acute ischemic changes using the sASPECTS (including caudate, lentiform nucleus, insula, and M5) can predict disability/death in anterior circulation stroke as accurately as the ASPECTS; and may help predict response to treatment and risk of developing symptomatic ICH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it