MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A BUSCA DE UM ETHOS PLANETÁRIO

2010· article· pt· W2517482931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectiva Teológica · 2010
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosHumanityPhilosophyHumanitiesSolidarityTheologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O fato de os seres humanos se sentirem na mesma casa comum, a Terra, permite-nos entender o sentido originário de ethos que em grego significa a morada humana, agora pensada globalmente. Faz-se urgente um ethos que represente um consenso mínimo que nos permite conviver com justiça e paz. São analisadas três propostas, de Hans Küng, fundada na religião, pois é um fenômeno universal; por Enrique Dussel, baseado no pobre coletivo que compõe as grandes maiorias da humanidade e a Carta da Terra que coloca a Terra e a Humanidade no centro das preocupações, brindando valores e princípios que favorecem a solidariedade entre todos os seres humanos e a responsabilidade universal pela Terra. Por fim o autor propõe sua própria visão, fundada no cuidado e na razão sensível e cordial.ABSTRACT: The fact of human beings feel on the same common home, the planet Earth, allows us to understand the original meaning of ethos which is in Greek human place now globally conceived. It is urgent an ethos that represents a minimum consensus letting us live together with justice and peace. It is presented three proposals, Hans Küng’s based on religion for it is an universal phenomenon, Enrique Dussel’s based on the collective poor who form the largest majorities of humanity, and the Earth Letter that brings Earth and humanity to the center of concerns, dealing with values and principles that support a solidarity among all human beings and the universal responsibility for the Earth. Finally the author proposes his own view, based on sensitive and cordial reason and caring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it