Bibliographic record
Abstract
O fato de os seres humanos se sentirem na mesma casa comum, a Terra, permite-nos entender o sentido originário de ethos que em grego significa a morada humana, agora pensada globalmente. Faz-se urgente um ethos que represente um consenso mínimo que nos permite conviver com justiça e paz. São analisadas três propostas, de Hans Küng, fundada na religião, pois é um fenômeno universal; por Enrique Dussel, baseado no pobre coletivo que compõe as grandes maiorias da humanidade e a Carta da Terra que coloca a Terra e a Humanidade no centro das preocupações, brindando valores e princípios que favorecem a solidariedade entre todos os seres humanos e a responsabilidade universal pela Terra. Por fim o autor propõe sua própria visão, fundada no cuidado e na razão sensível e cordial.ABSTRACT: The fact of human beings feel on the same common home, the planet Earth, allows us to understand the original meaning of ethos which is in Greek human place now globally conceived. It is urgent an ethos that represents a minimum consensus letting us live together with justice and peace. It is presented three proposals, Hans Küngs based on religion for it is an universal phenomenon, Enrique Dussels based on the collective poor who form the largest majorities of humanity, and the Earth Letter that brings Earth and humanity to the center of concerns, dealing with values and principles that support a solidarity among all human beings and the universal responsibility for the Earth. Finally the author proposes his own view, based on sensitive and cordial reason and caring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".