MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517791804 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/83.s1.529

Effect of Cryptorchidism on Human Testicular Transcriptome.

2010· article· en· W2517791804 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie Ève Bergeron, Christine Légaré, Ézéquiel Calvo, Marc Simard, Robert Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeminomaBiologySpermatogenesisTranscriptomeAndrologyTesticular cancerMale infertilityInfertilityGeneSertoli cellCYP17A1Leydig cellTesticlePathologicalInternal medicineEndocrinologyCancerGene expressionHormoneGeneticsPregnancyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptorchidism is the most common congenital disorder in boys. One major consequence of this anomaly is male infertility due to undescended testis to which an increased risk of testicular cancer is associated. The genetic cause of cryptorchidism remains to be elucidated. The objective of this study was to compare the transcriptome of human cryptorchid testis with normal tissues. Seminoma tissues were used as a positive control of genes known to be expressed in testicular cancer. Normal tissues were obtained with collaboration of our local organ transplantation program; the five donors were from 23 to 53 years of age. Cryptorchid testes were obtained by surgical orchidectomy performed on 4 patients from 29 to 43 years of age presenting with inguinal testis. Donors of seminoma tissues were from 22 to 34 years of age and were obtained through the pathological tissues bank of our institution. Tissues samples were kept on ice and snap freeze immediately upon arrival in the research lab. Total RNA was extracted from the tissues and used to probe Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays which include 28,869 genes with 764,885 distinct probes. In normal and cryptorchid tissues 2278 and 589 genes were up-regulated, respectively. As expected, transcripts known to be associated with spermatogenesis characterized the normal tissues whereas, in cryptorchid testes, transcripts of Leydig and Sertoli cells were found in higher amount. For example, PRM1 and ADAM2 transcripts associated to germ cells were in higher quantity in normal than cryptorchid testes, but CYP17A1, LHR and HSD17B3 transcripts of Leydig cells as well as GATA4, INHA and INHBA transcripts of Sertoli cells were higher in cryptorchid than normal testes. Some transcripts known to be associated with testicular cancer, such as CALR3 and PIWIL1, were up-regulated in normal tissues whereas KITLG and CCND2 were more expressed in cryptorchid testes. In seminoma tissues, PIWIL1 transcript was more expressed in cryptorchid but less in normal testicular cancer; the CALR3 and KITLG were less expressed in seminoma than in other tissues whereas the CCND2 was much more expressed in cancer tissues. Markers for testicular descent were more expressed in cryptorchids than in normal and seminomas as expected. These transcript expression patterns from the microarray results were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. Differences in transcriptome due to cryptorchidism will give us a clue to find the genetic cause of this disease. This work was supported by Canadian Institute of Health Research grant to Robert Sullivan. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207