MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optic nerve hemangioblastomas – a review of visual outcomes

2016· review· en· W2518015859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkish Neurosurgery · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemangioblastomaOptic nervePresentation (obstetrics)LesionCLARITYDifferential diagnosisRadiologyOphthalmologySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supratentorial hemangioblastomas (HBLs) are exceedingly uncommon. They account for less than 5% of all central nervous system HBLs. The commonest location is the cerebral cortex. Rarely, they can involve the visual pathway. Most of the reports have focused on the differential diagnosis, since depending on the location they can often resemble optic nerve gliomas or meningiomas of the optic nerve sheath. In this study, we describe a 67-year-old man with progressive diminution of vision in the left eye with an optic nerve hemangioblastoma. There was no history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. We discuss the diagnostic challenges, and review the visual presentation and visual outcomes in these patients. This report, we believe, may add further clarity in counseling patients with an optic nerve lesion and the factors in surgical decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it