MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Potential Impacts of Projected Climate Change on Flooding in the Riviere Des Prairies Basin, Quebec, Canada: One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Simulation-Based Approach

2016· article· en· W2518078867 on OpenAlexaffabout
Essoyéké Batchabani, Elsa Sormain, Musandji Fuamba

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrologic Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)Polytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)Environmental scienceClimate changeHydrology (agriculture)Structural basinDrainage basinHydrological modellingPhysical geographyGeographyGeologyGeomorphologyClimatologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Projection of floodplain extents is extremely important in identifying solutions that will establish the controls of land use in flood-loss reduction studies. The Riviere des Prairies, located in the province of Quebec, Canada, has many rapids that make the river basin highly vulnerable to potential flood loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hydrological and environmental impacts that climate change may have on the Riviere des Prairies basin. The design rainfalls considered are 50-year return period events lasting for 24 hours each and built using the Chicago method. The future intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves were derived from IDF_CC tool, which is especially designed for updating these curves under a changing climate. Representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios are used to simulate climate change for this purpose. The future flow hydrographs are obtained through rainfall-runoff transformations and results have been inputted into the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-GeoRAS) (calibrated with known water elevations and flows). The calibration results give a peak flow margin of error of +2% and a volume margin of error of −24%. Water levels are better simulated at the upstream portion of the Riviere des Prairies dam, with errors ranging from 16 to 95 cm. Despite the rising water, clearance remains higher than 3 meters for most of the bridges, which indicates that corresponding bridges will not be submerged or swept away. However, two bridges appear to be submerged with a water depth in range of 0.36 to 0.90 m for the first bridge (Ile Bizard), and 0.36 to 1.31 m for the second one (Lachapelle Bridge), depending on the model and simulated scenario. The results of the hydrodynamic simulations showed that some large flood zones were expected along the Riviere des Prairies from upstream up to the Médéric Martin A15 Bridge, as well as near the outlet. To mitigate the potential effects of flooding in the Riviere des Prairies basin, some adaptation and prevention measures have been recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrologic EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207