MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518124928 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2016.7527294

The design of 8-channel CMOS area-efficient low-power current-mode analog front-end amplifier for EEG signal recording

2016· article· en· W2518124928 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ya-Syuan Sung, Wei-Ming Chen, Chung‐Yu Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArctic Goose Joint VentureTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
KeywordsTransimpedance amplifierCMOSElectrical engineeringAmplifierMultiplexerOperational amplifierAnalog front-endElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMultiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an 8-channel area-efficient low-power current-mode analog front-end amplifier (AFEA) is designed for EEG signal recording. The AFEA is composed of eight capacitive coupled transconductors (CCGMs), current-mode band-pass filters (CMBPFs), and programmable current-gain amplifiers (PCGAs) with a multiplexer (MUX), a transimpedance amplifier (TIA), and an offset current cancellation loop (OCCL). The AFEA employs CCGM with only 2pF input capacitance to eliminate the electrode dc offset (EDO). The current-mode topology is adopted in the design of CCGMs, CMBPF s, and PCGAs to reduce the power consumption. The shared OCCL is designed to eliminate the output offset of CCGM, CMBPF and PCGA. The AFEA is designed and fabricated in 180-nm CMOS technology and the core area occupies only 1mm2. The measured maximum gain is 82 dB. The measured input-referred noise is 3.34μVrms within the bandwidth of 0.5-100 Hz. The measured maximum power consumption is 7.85 μW per channel under power supply of 1.2 V. The fabricated AFEA is applied to record the human EEG signal successfully.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207