CO<sub>2</sub>‐induced crystallization of polylactide and its self‐templating ‘stack of coins’ crystalline microstructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Can we learn from biomineralization process of natural materials to fabricate a three‐dimensional (3D) thick laminate microstructure by stacking of two‐dimensional (2D) crystalline structure? By adopting this self‐organization principle of biomineralization process, a polymer is crystallized two‐dimensionally into a multi‐layered architecture. Herein, we demonstrate a 2D crystallization method of polylactide and its principle of self‐organization to develop the discontinuous laminate microstructures. We find that instead of building a multilayered morphology layer‐by‐layer, the lamellar microstructures can be built in one step by using self‐organization principle of 2D crystallization. The biopolymer PLA is compression molded, and the molded samples are crystallized by using supercritical CO 2 in a high pressure vessel . The CO 2 ‐induced crystallization has a unique diffusion‐controlled crystallization mechanism, which tends to produce a disc‐shape spherultic structure. From microscopy analysis, we observe that these 2D spherulites are self‐organizing in nature and form 3D thick laminate structures with integrated amorphous phase in between. The obtained discontinuous laminate microstructure is comparable to “stack of coins” structure and we report the biomimetic approach of crystallization process. Thus, our study shows an innovative approach to engineer the crystalline microstructure of PLA. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 57:365–373, 2017. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".