MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P102: Characteristics of Practice of Primary Angioplasty in Quebec, Canada (2008-2009): A Systematic Field Evaluation

2011· article· en· W2518368818 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laurie Lambert, Yongling Xiao, Philippe L. L’Allier, Stéphane Rinfret, Simon Kouz, Dave Ross, Eli Segal, Sébastien Maire, Alain Vanasse, Peter Bogaty

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeJewish General HospitalInstitut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services SociauxSanté MontérégieCegep regional de LanaudiereMontreal Heart InstituteCégep de LévisInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionThrombusAngioplastyCardiologyInternal medicineInterventional cardiologyBalloonStentReperfusion therapyPrimary angioplastyPercutaneous coronary interventionSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Primary angioplasty (PPCI) is the predominant reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Quebec where there are 13 PPCI centers. Our systematic province-wide field evaluation examined contemporary practice of PPCI such as arterial access site and use of stents and thrombus aspiration devices. Methods: The 82 hospitals that treat over 95% of all acute myocardial infarctions occurring annually in Quebec participated in a systematic evaluation in 2008-9. Designated medical record librarians abstracted data from medical charts of patients with a final diagnosis of myocardial infarction who presented to an emergency room with characteristic symptoms. STEMI was confirmed by ECG interpretation. Results: Of 1876 treated STEMI patients, 1505 (80%) were sent for PPCI with 594 (39%) presenting directly to a PPCI center and 911 (61%) transferred from a non PPCI-capable center. Of these, 1334 patients (88 %) underwent PPCI. Almost all (1265/1334; 95%) had stent insertion (12% were drug-eluting stents). The radial approach was used in 844 (63%) patients with a median 12 min (6-21; all ranges 10-90 percentile) from first arterial puncture to first device. Patients with a femoral approach had a similar median delay [11 min (6-25)]. Door-to-balloon times were similar: 98 min (55-203) for the radial approach and 101 min (50-207) for the femoral approach. The first reperfusion device was a balloon in 687 patients (52%), a thrombus aspiration device in 485 patients (37%), and a direct stent in 145 patients (11%). Median delays from first puncture to first device were 13 min (7-26) for balloon, 10 min (6-18) for thrombus aspiration device, and 12 min (6-25) for direct stent deployment. There was substantial variation in radial versus femoral approach and type of first device by PPCI center. Conclusion: This contemporary evaluation of a complete system of STEMI care shows that most PPCI is performed in patients transferred from another hospital. The radial approach now predominates. The most frequent first reperfusion device is still the balloon but a substantial proportion of patients undergo thrombus aspiration. Drug eluting stent use was infrequent. Treatment delays did not vary by either arterial access site or type of first device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207