A formulation for IoT-enabled dynamic Service Selection across multiple Manufacturing clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud Manufacturing can provide mass manufacturing resources and capabilities as services via the Internet. Undoubtedly, multiple manufacturing clouds (MCs) will have extremely abundant services in terms of function, price, etc. The ability to leverage ample services hosted in MCs has direct relation to the success or failure of a manufacturer. Meanwhile, various uncertainties in today's highly-dynamic business environment can easily disrupt manufacturing activities, rendering original schedules ineffective or even obsolete. IoT's real-time sensing ability can be used to detect those uncertainties. However, little work has been done to take advantage of abundant services from MCs and to effectively deal with uncertainties. In order to address this issue, we propose a mathematical formulation for IoT-enabled dynamic Service Selection (SS) across multiple MCs. We consider three kinds of uncertainties (fluctuation of completion time, choices of manufacturing services, and runtime changes made by users) that come from both the user and market sides. The formulation can guide the dynamic SS and enable users to continuously adjust SS to be more effective and efficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".