MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518868259 · doi:10.1139/cjz-2016-0049

The eggs of the apple snail <i>Pomacea maculata</i> are defended by indigestible polysaccharides and toxic proteins

2016· article· en· W2518868259 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Matías L. Giglio, Santiago Ituarte, M.Y. Pasquevich, Horacio Heras

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMollusks and Parasites Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad Nacional de La PlataConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsPomacea canaliculataBiologySnailPolysaccharideBotanyFreshwater snailZoologyEcologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The freshwater snails Pomacea Perry, 1810 lay conspicuous aerial egg clutches that are ignored by most predators. Egg biochemical defenses in the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1822) are provided by multifunctional proteins. We analyzed the eggs of a sympatric species, Pomacea maculata Perry, 1810, studying the gross composition, toxicity, hemagglutinating activity, and its antinutritive and antidigestive properties. Eggs are mostly composed of polysaccharides (mainly galactogen) and proteins, followed by lipids and nonsoluble calcium. Two perivitellins account for ∼85% dry mass of the egg protein. The major lipids are phospholipids and sterols. A suite of potential defenses was determined, including strong lethal neurotoxicity on mice and moderate antidigestive and lectin activities. Remarkably, their polysaccharides were refractive to in vitro digestion by digestive glycosidases. This study characterized ∼99% of egg composition and identified multiple potential defenses, provided not only by proteins but also by polysaccharides. This is the first evidence to our knowledge that reserve sugars may be involved in defenses, giving further insight into the unusual reproductive strategy of these well-defended snail eggs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicMollusks and Parasites StudiesFrench-language works237,207