MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518897737

Geochemical Analysis of Deformed Metaconglomerates

2016· article· en· W2518897737 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Detaya Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueUWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ductile shear zones are formed by tectonic plate interactions and are often thought to be deep-seated equivalents to faults. They can act as either barriers or conduits for fluid flow, and fluids can alter deformation mechanisms, metamorphic reactions, and strain accumulation in shear zones. Even though fluid is such an important factor in deformation, it is difficult to study due to its transient nature, so geochemical analyses may be used to interpret fluid conditions during deformation. The Seine River metaconglomerates in northwestern Ontario, Canada deformed and metamorphosed in a shear zone during an ancient microplate collision. They have clasts with varied lithology including felsic to ultramafic volcanic and granitoid clasts. Selected samples were previously analyzed to determine strain magnitudes by Czeck et al. (2009) who demonstrated that different clast types had differing rheologies that resulted in a range of strain magnitudes. Strain magnitude also varied across the region. Geochemical analysis and evaluation for fluid-rock interaction had not previously been performed on the Seine River metaconglomerates and was the focus of this study. Compositions of several clasts types were determined at a range of strain magnitudes using major and minor element X-Ray Fluorescence. Results from 33 analyses were reviewed to see if there were significant changes in composition from low to high deformation sites. Preliminary results show that there was a high degree of variability amongst major constituents even within the same clast type at individual sample sites. The variability in deviation found in high strain granitoid clast range between 0.02%-4.81%, low strain granitiod clast range between 0.07%-6.06%, high strain mafic clast range between 0.09%-4.78%, low strain mafic clast range between 0.01%-3.23%, high strain felsic clast range between 0.05%-5.22%, low strain felsic clast range between 0.05%-6.76%. The variability between deviations show the averages overlap showing no apparent bulk volume change between high strain and low strain regions in the Rainy Lake Region. The inherent heterogeneity in metaconglomerates allows them to be extremely useful for strain analysis purposes, but complicates geochemical characterization because original clast composition significantly varies. Therefore, we will require a large sample size to capture the variability within the population of clasts and determine the extent of fluid-assisted alteration in deformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee)Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207