MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518914374 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07893

Experimental and Theoretical Study of the High-Temperature UV–Visible Spectra of Aqueous Hydroquinone and 1,4-Benzoquinone

2016· article· en· W2518914374 on OpenAlexafffund
Fereshteh Samiee, Federico N. Pedron, Darío A. Estrı́n, Liliana Trevani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersUniversidad de Buenos AiresNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsHydroquinoneAqueous solutionBenzoquinonePhotochemistry1,4-BenzoquinoneSpectral lineChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryQuinonePhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UV-visible spectroscopic studies of aqueous hydroquinone (HQ) and 1,4-benzoquinone (BQ) have been carried out along with classical molecular dynamics (MD) and quantum calculations. The experimental results confirmed that HQ is stable in hot compressed water up to at least 523 K at 70 bar, but BQ decomposes at temperatures lower than 373 K, leading to the formation of HQ and other nonabsorbing products. Even though benzoquinone is not stable, our study significantly extended the temperature range of other spectroscopic studies, and the spectra of HQ up to 523 K can still be useful for other studies, particularly those related to organic species in deep ocean hydrothermal vents. Classical MD simulations at high temperatures show, as expected, a weakening of the solute-solvent H-bonding interactions. The dependence of the maximum absorption of BQ on temperature was also analyzed, although a significant degree of decomposition was observed in the time frame of our experiments. The shift of the maximum absorption peak of BQ with temperature was consistent with time-dependent density functional theory calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207