Neuroprotective effects of hypothermia in inflammatory‐sensitized hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the recent introduction of hypothermia as a mandatory standard of care, the incidence of neonatal encephalopathy in full-term newborns and its devastating neuro-behavioral outcomes continues to be a major individual, familial and social issue. Neonatal encephalopathy is mainly due to the compounding and interacting effects of hypoxia-ischemia and inflammation resulting from placental and other perinatal infections. It is unclear why hypothermia is effective in alleviating neonatal encephalopathy in some, but not all, full-term newborns. However, newborns exposed to inflammatory-sensitized hypoxia-ischemia seem to have less therapeutic benefit from hypothermia than those exposed to hypoxia-ischemia alone. OBJECTIVES: To clarify this uncertainty, we tested the efficacy of hypothermia in a double-hit model of neonatal encephalopathy induced by inflammatory-sensitized hypoxia-ischemia. METHODS: Using a rat preclinical model of endotoxin plus hypoxia-ischemia-induced neonatal encephalopathy of term newborns, we assessed the following in pups exposed (or not) to hypothermia: the extent of brain injuries and the expressions of molecules implicated in neural cell death, namely: pro-inflammatory cytokines, matrix metalloproteinase-9, antioxidant enzymes, as well as receptor-interacting protein-3. RESULTS: Hypothermia was neuroprotective on inflammatory-sensitized hypoxia-ischemia-induced penumbra, but not core, brain injuries. This beneficial effect was associated with a hypothermia-induced increase of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase-1, glutathione peroxidase-1), but was not associated with any variations of the other inflammatory mediators tested, namely: interleukin-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, tumor necrosis factor-α and matrix metalloproteinase-9. CONCLUSION: Hypothermia is neuroprotective against inflammatory-sensitized hypoxia-ischemia possibly through a hypothermia-induced increase of antioxidant enzymes. This neuroprotective effect seems to be independent of the interleukin-1 system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".