MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519352234 · doi:10.1121/2.0000245

Effects of anthropogenic noise on fishes at the SGaan Kinghlas-Bowie Seamount Marine Protected Area

2016· article· en· W2519352234 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amalis Riera, Rodney A. Rountree, Xavier Mouy, John K. B. Ford, Francis Juanes

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of meetings on acoustics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of Victoria
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSeamountFish <Actinopterygii>Noise (video)SoundscapeEnvironmental scienceUnderwaterFisheryAmbient noise levelBioacousticsHabitatSound (geography)Computer scienceOceanographyGeologyEcologyBiologyTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underwater noise from anthropogenic sources has been increasing dramatically for the past few decades and little is known about its effects on fishes. The objective of this study is to describe the occurrence and characteristics of fish sounds in the SGaan Kinghlas-Bowie Seamount Marine Protected Area (SK-B MPA, British Columbia, Canada) and to correlate them with the corresponding anthropogenic soundscape. Here we present preliminary results of the detection of fish sounds at SK-B MPA between July 2011 and July 2013. An automatic detector was used on nearly 40,000 acoustic samples (4,754.5 hours in total) to search for fish sounds. About 1.2% of the data were highlighted as containing fish-like signals. Manual verification of these detections revealed that 95.5% were false positives and the remaining sounds were of unknown origin. Eighty detections were highly stereotyped and are suspected to be produced by fish, but no identification has been confirmed yet. Systematic manual inspection of sub-sampled acoustic data is yet to be performed to determine if the detector missed any fish sounds. Future deployments should select areas based on the presence of known fish habitat occurrence, and install autonomous recorders optimized to reduce equipment self-noise and flow noise biases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of meetings on acousticsSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207