MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Expanding our mission

2000· article· en· W2519649400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eileen Frazer

Bibliographic record

VenueAirMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccreditationCommissionGround transportationService (business)EngineeringMedicineBusinessMedical educationTransport engineeringFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A draft document for advanced life support (ALS)/basic life support (BLS) ground accreditation standards is being circulated for comments and suggestions. The Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems (CAMTS) has had ALS and BLS education and general standards for air transport since its inception. Several accredited programs that offer both air and ground services at all levels of care--BLS, ALS, and critical care--requested that CAMTS be able to accredit their entire service, including the ground ALSBLS transport team. Because air transport services nationwide appear to be adding ground services for all levels of care, the CAMTS board decided to add ground ALS-BLS to its accreditation process. This entity is not separate, however. It applies only to the ALS-BLS ground services that are a part of critical care ground or an air medical transport system. The typical 9-1-1 system would not be eligible to apply for CAMTS accreditation at this time. With completion of the first draft, CAMTS gave the process a trial run during site visits to MEDUCARE at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, S.C., and University Air Care at the University Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio. No accreditation actions resulted from the trial study, but draft standards were tested. This draft has been widely circulated for comments and was slated to be presented for recirculation or approval at the July 2000 board of directors meeting. The accreditation standards and process for ALS-BLS ground should be available by fall 2000. Shifting gears somewhat, CAMTS accreditation standards are recognized and sought worldwide. Dan Hankins, MD, current CAMTS chairman, gave a presentation at the June AIRMED 2000 Conference in Stavanger, Norway. CAMTS also exhibited during the conference, which was attended by worldwide air medical professionals. The Association of Air Medical Services and Air Medical Physician Association were among the eight supporting institutions of A I R M E D 2000. Members of the CAMTS board who attended the conference hosted a meeting with medical directors and program directors to establish common areas of compliance with the accreditation standards. European air medical programs have expressed an interest in applying for accreditation, and applicants from Mexico and Canada have asked for accreditation. In fact, Alberta STARS in Calgary (Canada) was the first air medical transport system outside the United States to be accredited. Lq

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0180.017
Open science0.0030.025
Research integrity0.0070.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2110.124

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAirMed→Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→