LES CAUSES DE L'ISOLEMENT PROFESSIONNEL DES ENSEIGNANTES ET DES ENSEIGNANTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUME. L'etude, realisee aupres de 1217 enseignants, s'interesse aux causes percues de leur isolement professionnel. Afin de classifier ces causes, la presente s'appuie sur une demarche d'analyse de contenu basee sur un systeme categoriel inspire de la theorie cognitive de la solitude (Peplau et Perlman, 1982). Les resultats montrent, entre autres, que les causes percues par les enseignants sont davantage liees a des caracteristiques stables de leur quotidien qu'a des evenements ponctuels. Enfin, l'etude propose quelques pistes de recherche et d'intervention visant a briser l'isolement professionnel. CAUSES OF TEACHERS' PROFESSIONALISOLATION ABSTRACT. This study, conducted with the participation of 1217 teachers, investigates why teachers feel professionally isolated. A content analysis based on a cognitive theory of isolation (Peplau & Perlman, 1982) was used to classify the perceived causes. The results show that the teachers' feelings are more related to the daily routines than unexpected events. Finally, further research and initiatives are suggested in order to put an end to the teachers' feelings of isolation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".