MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519745348 · doi:10.5957/mt1.2000.37.1.23

Widening of the Great Lakes Bulk Carrier MV Algoville

2000· article· en· W2519745348 on OpenAlex
David J. Munro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Technology and SNAME News · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsEssar Steel Algoma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemisePort (circuit theory)EngineeringService (business)HullOceanographyArchaeologyForensic engineeringTelecommunicationsMarine engineeringGeographyGeologyPolitical scienceMechanical engineeringEconomyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Senneville was built in 1967. She was managed from 1973 to 1990 by Scott Misener Steamships (later Misener Transportation) and from 1990 to 1994 by Great Lakes Bulk Carriers (GLBC). With the demise of Great Lakes Bulk Carriers (GLBC) in 1994, the ship was purchased by Algoma Central Marine and the name was changed to Algoville. This paper gives a brief outline of the history of the ship, including ownership and events leading up to the need for major structural modifications and also discusses some of the design aspects leading to the decision to widen the hull from 75 ft-3 in. to 78 ft-0 in. (22.8 to 23.7 m) beam. A brief description of the widening project by Port Weller Dry Docks is presented, followed by some thoughts on the results of the widening and the successful operation of the vessel since returning to service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it