MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519745348 · doi:10.5957/mt1.2000.37.1.23

Widening of the Great Lakes Bulk Carrier MV Algoville

2000· article· en· W2519745348 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Munro

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Technology and SNAME News · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsEssar Steel Algoma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemisePort (circuit theory)EngineeringService (business)HullOceanographyArchaeologyForensic engineeringTelecommunicationsMarine engineeringGeographyGeologyPolitical scienceMechanical engineeringEconomyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Senneville was built in 1967. She was managed from 1973 to 1990 by Scott Misener Steamships (later Misener Transportation) and from 1990 to 1994 by Great Lakes Bulk Carriers (GLBC). With the demise of Great Lakes Bulk Carriers (GLBC) in 1994, the ship was purchased by Algoma Central Marine and the name was changed to Algoville. This paper gives a brief outline of the history of the ship, including ownership and events leading up to the need for major structural modifications and also discusses some of the design aspects leading to the decision to widen the hull from 75 ft-3 in. to 78 ft-0 in. (22.8 to 23.7 m) beam. A brief description of the widening project by Port Weller Dry Docks is presented, followed by some thoughts on the results of the widening and the successful operation of the vessel since returning to service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Technology and SNAME NewsSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207