Entre Franciscanos e Beneditinos: o caso de Domingos do Loreto Couto (1696-1762)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo busca analisar a trajetória de vida do religioso pernambucano Domingos do Loreto Couto, reconhecido pela historiografia como autor de importante obra para o entendimento da primeira metade do século XVIII: Desagravos do Brasil e Glórias de Pernambuco. Não priorizaremos a face cronista de nossa personagem, antes, utilizaremos sua trajetória como elemento que nos permitirá ter uma visão mais alargada do período em tela, principalmente no que toca aos casos de religiosos que transitavam entre ordens regulares, prática recorrente até o segundo quartel do século XVIII. Assim sendo, acreditamos que a trajetória de Loreto nos convida a compreender em escala micro as estruturas de poder da esfera eclesiástica, os diálogos e embates entre ordens religiosas e poderes diocesanos, ou mesmo a relação de conectividade entre as dioceses ultramarinas e o centro da monarquia cristã.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".