Traditional Cultural Accommodations and Community Development in the Creative Tourism Perspective: The Case of ‘Hanokstay’ Program in South Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reviews the development policies of traditional cultural accommodations as community development from the perspective of creative tourism. The Hanokstay program in South Korea is chosen to examine the challenges and opportunities posed by the process of developing and promoting the place-based cultural accommodation sector. The selected case sites are reviewed through the related themes of ‘service and product’; ‘sales and marketing’; ‘planning and development’; and ‘policy’. The result of the review illustrates the evolution of the traditional cultural accommodation sector in the context of creative tourism and highlights the tension that exists between the provision of traditional experiences through the use of modern technologies. ----------------------------------------------------------- Résumé Cet article étudie les politiques de développement des constructions traditionnelles et culturelles dans le cadre de développement communautaire à partir d'une perspective de tourisme créatif. Le programme Hanokstay (séjour dans une maison traditionnelle Hanok) en Corée du Sud est choisi pour examiner les défis et opportunités soulevés par le processus de développement et la promotion du secteur de l'hébergement culturel en milieu local. Les sites sélectionnés sont examinés en fonction des thèmes de 'service et produit'; 'ventes et marketing'; 'planification et développement'; 'régulations'. Le résultat de l'évaluation montre l'évolution du secteur de l'hébergement traditionnel culturel dans le secteur du tourisme créatif et met en valeur la tension qui existe entre la mise à disposition des expériences traditionnelles et l'usage des technologies modernes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".